Going nowhere: Ireland put the squeeze on Scottish dominance at the turn of the millennium and haven’t looked back. Pic: ©SNS Group
By Neil Drysdale
17 March 2010 11:11 GMT
For those of us who followed Scottish rugby during the 1990s, the Irish were the one country we could always be relied upon to take to the cleaners. Incredible as it might appear nowadays, the SRU’s finest were unbeaten against their Celtic rivals between 1989 and 1999, a period during which they racked up 11 victories and a draw.
Since then, however, fortune has been turned on its head, with the likes of Brian O’Driscoll, Paul O’Connell and Ronan O’Gara deriving regular pleasure from knocking Scottish noses out of joint. They and their compatriots have win nine of the last 10 meetings between the sides and even that solitary defeat, a 31-21 loss at Murrayfield in 2007, occurred when the visitors were experimenting with their line-up for that year’s World Cup.
If this was just happening in rugby, I suppose we could simply regard it as evidence of the cyclical nature of sport. But in cricket, the Irish have made a habit of qualifying for showpiece tournaments, whereas the Scots have gone backwards since 2005.
In football, Thierry Henry’s deliberate handball might have prevented the Republic from advancing to this summer’s World Cup in South Africa but at least the Irish were in the play-offs in the first place. By comparison, Scotland had long since checked out of their group.
In short, there have to be reasons why Erin’s representatives have established momentum across the spectrum, where the Scots have either stalled or gone into reverse gear. And one of the most obvious differences between the two countries is the success of their provincial structure and the pride in which youngsters derive from participating for the likes of Munster and Leinster.
In Ireland, as I discovered when I was across there recently, there isn’t a relentless obsession with football and, in particular, the foibles of the Old Firm, which ensures that kids are encouraged to pursue other team sports, without growing up with the notion that soccer is the only thing that matters.
In the grand scheme, this has to make a significant difference. Whether in sponsors investing massive sums in youth sports, be it in rugby, hurling, cricket or cycling, or in their governing bodies building pathways between their clubs and provinces, Irish children grow up with a breadth of interests which differs starkly with the situation in Scotland.
Over there, it is a genuine privilege to represent your local community, and the attendances at GAA matches, or even youth rugby competitions, testify to how the process has forged new partnerships as professionalism has kicked in. It doesn’t explain everything, but when was the last time you heard a youngster in Scotland claiming that it was his heart’s desire to play for Glasgow or Edinburgh, Aberdeen or Dundee?
Too often here, the arguments tend to revolve around parochial short-termism and, in rugby at least, it was one of the worst transgressions, perpetrated by the old SRU administrators, when they chose to play fast and loose with their districts, an act of vandalism whose reverberations continue to stunt the development of the game.
By comparison, Munster, Leinster and Ulster boast passionately committed fan bases, comprising tens of thousands of more supporters than those who follow Glasgow and Edinburgh. No wonder their youth set-ups are flourishing, while their success in the Heineken Cup, all three have lifted the trophy in the last 15 years, puts Scotland’s record in that event to shame.
There are a few mitigating factors which should not be ignored. If the SRU’s officials had persevered with a crumbling stadium for another decade in the early 1990s, rather than electing to re-develop Murrayfield by recourse to a debenture scheme, they would have gained government funding, which might have prevented them from falling into dire financial straits.
The IRFU carried on playing internationals at Lansdowne Road, even when the arena was as rickety as their team in the ‘90s, but subsequently benefited from the ephemeral rise of the Irish economy and are in rude fiscal health as a consequence.
So too, the Scots have produced a number of world-class contenders in some pursuits, such as tennis with Andy Murray; Hannah Miley and Kirsty Balfour in swimming; and cycling with Chris Hoy and David Millar, which has not been replicated across the water.
But generally, for a nation with fewer than four million inhabitants, and whether we concentrate on team sports, or marvel at this week’s annual Irish pilgrimage to the Cheltenham Festival, our near neighbours have punched well above their weight at the highest level.
Too many Scots, by comparison, appear fixated with the latest extra-curricular antics of the likes of Allan McGregor and wading into endless refereeing controversies, or regarding beating the English as the be-all-and-end-all.
If prizes were awarded for petty point-scoring, political in-fighting, mutual suspicion between Edinburgh and Glasgow and wallowing in a culture of negativity, the Scots would be kings of the world. But they are not and, once again this weekend, it is Ireland who are chasing a Triple Crown while the Scots are trying to avoid the wooden spoon. Time, surely, for us to ask why?
Last updated: 17 March 2010, 11:14